The Proper Care & Feeding of Husbands

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-06-2003
The Proper Care & Feeding of Husbands
1731
Wed, 07-11-2007 - 6:29pm

I recently read "The Proper Care & Feeding of Relationships" by Dr. Laura Schlessinger and was surprised to find I agreed with much of what she said in the book...so I returned to the library to borrow "The Proper Care & Feeding of Husbands" and again...I find I agree with most of what she writes. I would have scoffed at the titles alone 12 years ago when I was married, working up the corporate ladder with my 2 year old in dc full time from 11 months on. I thought I had it all.

I ended up divorced and now the 2 year old is 14 and I realized recently how fast she is growing up and that I really missed a lot of time with her and my husband by choice(working).

I am remarried and 3 yrs ago our son was born. I returned to work when he was 10 months and found what I think is the best dayhome I could have...they were amazing and very loving. Our family is very close with them now....I was working(primary breadwinner) and couldn't shake the feeling that I was putting my career ahead of my family when my family is monumentally more important to me than the money I was bringing in. We COULD change our situation to enable me to be at home...so we did and I now wonder why any mother who is emotionally healthy and does not *have* to work for the family to get by....doesn't stay at home? I am not meaning that disrespectfully or sarcastically as I myself did not make that choice with myt first. I resigned 9 months ago. I am proud to be at home even though I wasn't with my first(which I now regret but didn't think I would!). I am proud to send my husband off to work with hot coffee and a lunch I made that always includes homebaked treats....welcome him home to a clean home and wonderful meal...spend my days teaching my son and playing with him; treasuring it sincerely...and being here for my 14 year old daughter whether she needs me to yell at; or hug and talk...or just to stop her from sitting on the computer all day or getting into mischief.

To give you the tone of the books I will give you a couple of excerpts;

"The issue of "roles" in a marriage and family is often a sensitive one. Stay-at-home moms as well as hardworking primary-breadwinner men are not given much respect from our society-at-large. Feminist educators and activists keep trying to squeeze men and women into niches that may simply not be a good match for their innate qualites...as well as their masculine and feminine drives. It is more in the female nature to nest and nurture. It is more in the male nature to conquer and protect. Frankly, the more we ignore the true, inherent masculine and feminine qualites of people, the farther apart we pull them."

"...feminism has brainwashed women to believe that all men are inconsiderate beasts you can't rely on. Therefore, the threat goes, never give up your independence. This mentality has confsed and frightened women into an avoidance of becoming dependant on their men. To protect themselves, women ferociously parry with their men, while denigrating their own desires to tend the home and raise children. Then they call me all angry and depressed... nd they think it is because of their husbands."

So...what do you think?

*edit to correct a typo




Edited 7/11/2007 7:57 pm ET by hi_kimmie

Photobucket

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-27-1998
Wed, 07-18-2007 - 10:13am

So is he actually

PumpkinAngel

iVillage Member
Registered: 12-29-2004
Wed, 07-18-2007 - 10:14am
No, there's no question at all of how someone can choose to be disabled. Everybody knows someone who made that choice. What you're talking about is fraud.
iVillage Member
Registered: 06-10-2007
Wed, 07-18-2007 - 10:14am
he is disabled. if he wasn't would he receive a check? if it turns out he's committing fraud or some sort, he'll be found out and then we can judge.
iVillage Member
Registered: 06-10-2007
Wed, 07-18-2007 - 10:15am
I'm not an investigator, I have no right to judge him as others on this board did elsewhere when they labeled him a fraud, lmao.
iVillage Member
Registered: 12-29-2004
Wed, 07-18-2007 - 10:16am
Nope, that's not the context we were talking about. What we were talking about is the difference between the truly disabled and those who commit fraud, that is, *pretending* to be disabled.
iVillage Member
Registered: 06-10-2007
Wed, 07-18-2007 - 10:16am
how do you know he's not disabled?
iVillage Member
Registered: 06-27-1998
Wed, 07-18-2007 - 10:16am

Ah, so he did not choose to be disabled, he is choosing to "act" disabled. Big difference.


What qualifies you to judge if he is truly disabled or not?

PumpkinAngel

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-27-1998
Wed, 07-18-2007 - 10:17am

Then you

PumpkinAngel

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-10-2007
Wed, 07-18-2007 - 10:17am

"So he was hurt and now he is disabled?"
Yes, I have said that.
"Was this a self inflected injury or an accident?"
I have no idea.

Avatar for mkatherine
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-27-2003
Wed, 07-18-2007 - 10:17am
you can "lmao' all you want but YOU'RE the one who said you didn't think he truly was disabled...hence all teh fraud comments. then all of the sudden you're saying you don' tknow and it's not our place to judge...so fine...either you think he is disabled or he isn't but when you first started talking about him you indicated that you did not think he was truly disabled.

 

Yes. We. Did.

Pages