SAH doesn't support change,
Find a Conversation
SAH doesn't support change,
| Sat, 08-26-2006 - 4:58pm |
"SAH doesn't support change, it supports going backwards to the 1950's,"
Statement in a post below.
I wholeheartedly disagree. To me, SAH is a choice. How is that going back to the 1950s, when a lot of women didn't have much of a choice.

Pages
"You wouldn't have had to know about her mom for your post to come across as being written by a heartless bitch."
By golly, is that a TOS violation?
I didn't say it was an excuse for *her* to consume more calories. I was speaking generally. Did I actually personalize that post?
So the program does help some kids? As for the Harry Potter thing, it is based on pages...you can read a 50 page book and have it count as 1 book, or you can read a 150 page book and have it count as 3 books.
<>
So what? At least he has more exposure to reading. At least he was given more of a chance to like it. If he still hates it after that, ok then. It's not like he was going to love it if the program hadn't been there and he just didn't read.
<>
No, if those kids are not interested in participating in the program or receiving the rewards, they don't have to participate. Why would they? Participation is not in any way mandatory...which is why it is an EXTRA.
<>
THAT is what I'm talking about. That's not the programs fault...that is faulty parenting. The children who have parents willing to do that are much more likely IMO to grow up with a sense of entitlement than the kids who EARNED the little extras.
Pages