SAH doesn't support change,
Find a Conversation
SAH doesn't support change,
| Sat, 08-26-2006 - 4:58pm |
"SAH doesn't support change, it supports going backwards to the 1950's,"
Statement in a post below.
I wholeheartedly disagree. To me, SAH is a choice. How is that going back to the 1950s, when a lot of women didn't have much of a choice.

Pages
excuse me.......what does pka have to do with my remark to tb3? no need to read more than what's there,cm. geesh.
and about your other post to me tonight,no thanks. there's absolutely nothing to respond to. we disagree......besides,this thread has already reached a very applauding 3000. lol.
Edited 9/23/2006 7:06 pm ET by egd3blessed
My children know that the only reason they will ever have a cell phone is purely for emergency purposes. They won't be one of those kids who has one just for the sake of having one. Unless they pay for it themselves - by getting a job, remember we don't do allowances - they won't be getting one.
As for the car, grandpa already said he is buying them one. We won't have to.
Anything that no longer gets results. A friend of mine has a teenage daughter. This daughter has been given an allowance since she was 5 years old based on chores she did around the house. Her parents claimed that it was going to teach her how to manage her money, how to be a good steward. She is now 17, refuses to get a job, refuses to help out her parents in any way. Still she gets her allowance - and has no savings. Her parents still think that they are going to use this system to teach her good stewardship. The award is no longer getting the desired result, it is useless.
Different situations, different lines.
That's probably what will make us get cells, too.
Sabina
Oh, life is a glorious cycle of song,
Pages