SAH doesn't support change,
Find a Conversation
SAH doesn't support change,
| Sat, 08-26-2006 - 4:58pm |
"SAH doesn't support change, it supports going backwards to the 1950's,"
Statement in a post below.
I wholeheartedly disagree. To me, SAH is a choice. How is that going back to the 1950s, when a lot of women didn't have much of a choice.

Pages
She said it wasn't your fault; what more do you want from her?
And for the record, my Mom is still alive and so is my MIL, but living so far from her, I often cook some of our favorite foods. It helps us feel at home when we're not. There's no crime in that.
And as for the "excuse to overeat" nonsense, I suggest you refresh your familiarity with the concept of "feast". Feasts are INTENDED to be meals at which one eats more than normal. That's why they're feasts.
Again, I paid attention in elementary school, I understand about the pilgrims, etc. Thanks for the lesson though.
And I'm not sure what makes you think I haven't been to a Passover Sedar. The food is symbolic, but the meaning exists beyond the food. It is not necessary to the holiday.
<>
This right here is why TM was dead balls on right. She might have violated TOS saying it to you, but she was right.
Every significant celebration in the Old Testament, as handed down by God to Moses, revolves around feasts--they are commanded by God. They're holy and sacred.
In human tradition *most* of the important celebrations involve food in a significant and profound way. There are also fasts, but they are typically preparatory to a celebration, not part of it and those are typically followed by a traditional feast.
Pages