SAH doesn't support change,
Find a Conversation
SAH doesn't support change,
| Sat, 08-26-2006 - 4:58pm |
"SAH doesn't support change, it supports going backwards to the 1950's,"
Statement in a post below.
I wholeheartedly disagree. To me, SAH is a choice. How is that going back to the 1950s, when a lot of women didn't have much of a choice.

Pages
<> No one could possibly know this. Even a school employee cannot possibly be at every conversation between teachers and principal.
And what can a child possibly learn by going to a baseball game? Nothing. What he learns is school is optional (and I can only imagine the impact that will have on his work ethic and attitude toward his future job), truancy is possible and he gets these values sanctioned by *his own parents.* Brilliant!
<>
Then why have them go to school at all?
Exactly. And how does a parent expect the teacher and principal to respond anyway? Parent A approaches principal and teacher gleefully explaining he has already purchased tickets to the Playoffs, they have excellent seats and Johnny won't be at school on a specific day that week, the principal and teacher can't really say anything about truancy that would get thru to the Parent. They've simply been told what's happening; they have not been conulted.
I'm a mean mommie - my kids don't get mental health days sanctioned by me and DH.
Edited 9/26/2006 7:02 am ET by tinderbox03
<>
Are you a sahm, like I am? That would explain it right there. ;)
As for the rest of your post, LOL!
Pages