SAH doesn't support change,
Find a Conversation
SAH doesn't support change,
| Sat, 08-26-2006 - 4:58pm |
"SAH doesn't support change, it supports going backwards to the 1950's,"
Statement in a post below.
I wholeheartedly disagree. To me, SAH is a choice. How is that going back to the 1950s, when a lot of women didn't have much of a choice.

Pages
That's the central conundrum: how to give each lifestyle choice the respect it deserves.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Do you mean preparation in terms of education and work experience, or in terms of savings and investments?
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
how could pumping while or especially after nursing help if, as you claim, pumping is less efficient than breastfeeding--if a pump can't or likely won't take as much or more than a baby will?
When babies are hungry, they are more efficient than pumps. However, eventually baby gets full, and the only thing left to do to increase your supply is pump. Pumping INSTEAD of feeding does not help. Pumping during a feeding or after one means that you get the efficiency of the baby's suckle, then the extra expressing from the pump. Pumping along with breastfeeding is an extra 'oompf.' Pumping instead of it is not. If you don't believe me, ask a nurse, lactation consultant, or even a doctor. And my expertise about pumping doesn't just come from the CDC, BabyTalk magazine, etc. It also comes from my own experiences, the experiences I've heard from others, and what the doctors and nurses in the hospital DIRECTLY told me about pumping and nursing. Pumping WHILE nursing or AFTER nursing means all the milk the baby wants is expressed, then a bit more from the pump. Pumping INSTEAD of nursing doesn't get near as much milk out as baby nursing, nor does it work to increase your supply because the power of the suckle is not as strong. That may not make sense to you, lol, but it's the truth. You can keep telling me how it's contradictory and blah blah, but ask any nurse or lactation consultant (you know, someone who actually knows something about nursing), and they'll tell ya the same. That you don't understand doesn't mean it's untrue.
My husband's steady paycheck, health, and retirement benefits are enough for us right now, and we'll have stock and options later on. I don't need them personally.
I'm glad that your situation works out so well, but not every situation is so peachy. Just because you have a nice boss and a job that's close by doesn't mean everyone will. I'm glad you have a job that you'd miss, but once again, I don't feel I'm missing anything. Stock options and a nice boss don't compare to the satisfaction I get from being with my son.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Pages