SAH/WOH--extramarital affairs
Find a Conversation
SAH/WOH--extramarital affairs
| Tue, 02-15-2005 - 12:54pm |
I was just at the gym this morning and overheard a conversation between two women on treadmills who were discussing/debating as to whether married sahms were any more or less likely to have affairs than married wohms.
I thought it would be interesting to hear your thoughts on this.

Pages
As I said before you are priceless.
You say if you lie you are a liar, yet I am the one labelling and I am the one claiming that a single label defines the whole person? I have not once stated that a single action defines one's character. I am, in fact, debating that.
Yes, indeed sweetie, do try to keep up.
<>
Well neither have we. So why do you keep arguing on that point with us when it's not something we disagree on?????
Choose your friends by their character and your socks by their color. Choosing your socks by their character makes no sense and choosing your friends by their color is unthinkable.
I have said repeatedly that we agree on that point. We agree that one action does not define a person. But if you label the person you ARE defining a facet of the person. I guess where you and I disagree is on the fairness of assigning a label. I disagree with labelling a person as a liar for telling one lie.
BTW, I can't argue alone. If I am arguing with you, you are arguing with me! lol
Nick
<>
They are. That label can be removed if the action doesn't continue.
Choose your friends by their character and your socks by their color. Choosing your socks by their character makes no sense and choosing your friends by their color is unthinkable.
So, you do consider Melissa a liar?
Funny how you haven't answered that one.
Nick
It seemed relatively unimportant. And rather childish to bring other people into this and use real life scenarios to prove your point.
It really shouldn't matter to anyone but Missie. I think she has a pretty good grasp of how I feel about her. If she wants clarification, SHE can ask for it. Her and I's relationship is really none of your business.
Choose your friends by their character and your socks by their color. Choosing your socks by their character makes no sense and choosing your friends by their color is unthinkable.
I wasn't trying to make your relationship my business. And thank you for proving my point. You simply cannot call a person immoral for a single action. Why not use real life examples? Melissa used her situation as a real life example, I simply expanded upon it. FDE used her situation as a real life example, as did Kristi, as did you, and as did I.
As TM pointed out, we are all flawed. Which is exactly why circumstances matter. Certain actions are wrong, but the circumstances surrounding the action make a huge difference. Sometimes, doing wrong is the right thing to do. In spite of TM stating that I am contradicting myself for saying that there are no absolutes, there aren't. Of course some acts are immoral - the person committing the act is not, necessarily, immoral. We are not in a position to judge unless we are judging our own actions - those are the only ones we truly have enough information to make an accurate assessment.
Nick
Two disagreements and then I'm gonna have to be done .. this has exhausted me ...
<>
No. Wrong is never right.
<>
Nope. If the person's actions affect you, particularly in the negative, then you most definitely have the right to judge.
Choose your friends by their character and your socks by their color. Choosing your socks by their character makes no sense and choosing your friends by their color is unthinkable.
Pages