Saying over and over again that you have provided evidence to support your view that TV and video games are necessary for a well-rounded education doesn't make it so. I told you the first time you provided those links that they don't even mention TV or video games being necessary to learn anything.
But, we've been through this several times. I ask for an example of something that TV or video games are necessary to learn about. You give an example. I counter with how it can be learned without TV or video games. You say that you didn't mean that TV and video games are the only way to learn that something. I ask you to look up the word necessary. Because until you understand the definition of word necessary and how it is correctly used in the English language, it is impossible to debate whether or not something is necessary.
I already told you someone agreed with me, if you dont believe me you research it. Obviously b/c no one actually read the links, but perhaps skimmed they missed where it was specifically stated. In fact it was in the first link about educational television programs.
You can roll your eyes all you want you need to find the links if you skimmed them or never read them, There is no logiacl reason for me to hunt for them, I already know what they said.
Well if iam posting my opinion Iam obviously here to debate issues not ppl. Could you support your assumptions about whatever you think i admitted with some fact? B/c that is not even close to what i said.
<>
Nice cop out... b/c you cannot prove what you say to be fact.
Pages
LoL....
PumpkinAngel
Oh man...I wish.
PumpkinAngel
Post #2900 you said:
"<>
For a school aged child? NOT!"
(you were replying to what was my text in the quotes).
Post #2940 I said, to counter...
"For any child who hasn't yet weaned, yes.
School-aged or no."
Fio
Saying over and over again that you have provided evidence to support your view that TV and video games are necessary for a well-rounded education doesn't make it so. I told you the first time you provided those links that they don't even mention TV or video games being necessary to learn anything.
But, we've been through this several times. I ask for an example of something that TV or video games are necessary to learn about. You give an example. I counter with how it can be learned without TV or video games. You say that you didn't mean that TV and video games are the only way to learn that something. I ask you to look up the word necessary. Because until you understand the definition of word necessary and how it is correctly used in the English language, it is impossible to debate whether or not something is necessary.
LOL ITA too!!!
Fio
I already told you someone agreed with me, if you dont believe me you research it. Obviously b/c no one actually read the links, but perhaps skimmed they missed where it was specifically stated. In fact it was in the first link about educational television programs.
You can roll your eyes all you want you need to find the links if you skimmed them or never read them, There is no logiacl reason for me to hunt for them, I already know what they said.
End of story!
Well if iam posting my opinion Iam obviously here to debate issues not ppl. Could you support your assumptions about whatever you think i admitted with some fact? B/c that is not even close to what i said.
<>
Nice cop out... b/c you cannot prove what you say to be fact.
Typical!
Edited 4/13/2007 4:26 pm ET by xenozany
Pages