I must say, your views wrt children are very disturbing to me.
I can't for the life of me figure out why you have such an issue with a child's natural, biological, instinctual need to suck as well as to nurse for comfort. It's simply built in to their biology. They are programmed that way. These needs are intrinsic to them. They are universal to every child.
Do you disagree? IOW, do you believe that they DON'T have a natural, biological, instinctual need to suck as well as to nurse for comfort? That it's NOT simply built in to their biology? That they are NOT programmed that way? That these needs are NOT intrinsic to them? That they are NOT universal to every child?
Do you think that refusing to acknowledge these very real biological needs means that they don't exist? Do you think that your children are somehow biologically different than every other child in the world?
There are only two explanations here:
1. Either your children have the same biological needs as every other child on the planet.
2. Or you simply refuse to acknowledge the very real biological needs of children.
You did. In was in reference to the fact that I told you you had it backwards. Then you admitted that it was you that had issue with what I was saying. So can you explain what you meant by Im good?
<<>>
Then you later accused me of it.
<<>>
I understand that. Still doesnt make sense. SO I guess we are at a stopping point.
Pages
<>
Follow the post back, I'm sure I quoted comments that it refers to.
<>
No actually if you note, I asked a question, it wasn't an assumption.
PumpkinAngel
The other was worse, so that's okay.
PumpkinAngel
<<You are the one using judgement, stereotyping, feelings not ivillage. >>
Yes, but not in this context.
PumpkinAngel
I must say, your views wrt children are very disturbing to me.
I can't for the life of me figure out why you have such an issue with a child's natural, biological, instinctual need to suck as well as to nurse for comfort. It's simply built in to their biology. They are programmed that way. These needs are intrinsic to them. They are universal to every child.
Do you disagree? IOW, do you believe that they DON'T have a natural, biological, instinctual need to suck as well as to nurse for comfort? That it's NOT simply built in to their biology? That they are NOT programmed that way? That these needs are NOT intrinsic to them? That they are NOT universal to every child?
Do you think that refusing to acknowledge these very real biological needs means that they don't exist? Do you think that your children are somehow biologically different than every other child in the world?
There are only two explanations here:
1. Either your children have the same biological needs as every other child on the planet.
2. Or you simply refuse to acknowledge the very real biological needs of children.
So which is it?
<<>>
You did. In was in reference to the fact that I told you you had it backwards. Then you admitted that it was you that had issue with what I was saying. So can you explain what you meant by Im good?
<<>>
Then you later accused me of it.
<<>>
I understand that. Still doesnt make sense. SO I guess we are at a stopping point.
<<>>
Thank you for admitting that.
<<>>
Well I would hope so.
"Post the data that you have that backs up your theory of every child on the planet."
What theory of every child on the planet?
Pages