"We don 't believe in that [WOHM]"
Find a Conversation
| Mon, 01-09-2006 - 11:31am |
On Friday, as I was driving hom from work, I stumbled across an interview with the wife of the one surviving miner from the collapse in WVa. In the course of the interview, someone asked her if she worked.
Her response was that they don't believe in that. She explained that her husband was very proud of the fact that he was the sole supporter of the family, and that he didn't need her help in supporting them. She explained that they just don't believe in women working after they have kids and husbands, and that they believe her place is at home with the kids.
My heart really goes out to her, and this post isn't about her, but about the sentiment that women shouldn't work because their place is at home. And being a real man, even if it means working in dangerous conditions, long hours, holding two jobs and being a step away from poverty at every turn, means that your wife doesn't work.
I suppose this is the first time that I've heard someone, not a movie character or a character in a book, express this sentiment. I don't understand why anyone would be proud to limit their spouse's potential. Or why be proud that you live right on the poverty line?
If they didn't see the dangers of their POV before, surely that entire community, and even the whole country, has now seen the risk that we talk about on here all the time, the risk that suddenly the SAHM will need to find a way to financially support the family. I wonder if anyone will re-think what they believe in.

Pages
Hey, lets debate!
PumpkinAngel
Since M3T is a WOHM, and since she mentioned choosing sides, I assume she'd side with us. Well, not you, since you SAH, but with those of us on the board who WOH. I just don't know what to do if, say, you and I were to agree. Then whose side do people pick.
BTW--I'm being totally tongue in cheek here.
Why are you calling me dishonest when you don't know what my employer's policies on Internet usage during working hours is?
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
<>
5yos aren't taught religious values? Surely those differ ...
Everything else you explain in your post is, imo, "reinforcing" ... not "instilling." I realize my use of the word may differ from a dictionary definition, but that's the only way I'm able to explain it to myself, much less others. I do think teachers/ccps/etc have a role in morals/values, but they don't *decide* which ones are taught. I know, for certain, that several of ds/dd's ccp have had differing moral and religious values than I. They didn't (and can't) choose to teach those to my children. That's my realm.
"...(I make every effort not to make friends here!)..."
You're really excellent at that.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Pages