Work is good for your health?
Find a Conversation
| Mon, 05-15-2006 - 5:25am |
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/healthnews.php?newsid=43421
Working Mothers Healthier Than Full-time Housewives
Main Category: Women's Health / OBGYN News
Article Date: 15 May 2006 - 1:00am (PDT)
According to new research carried out in Britain, working mothers enjoy better health than full-time housewives. Despite the stress working mothers face by holding down a job, dealing with childcare, housework and striving to keep the family happy.
It appears that working mothers, when compared to full-time housewives, are less likely to become overweight, have a better level of health and a healthier relationship. The study also found that single mothers experience worse health than working mothers who have a partner and children.
You can read about this study in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
Team leader, Dr. Anne McMunn, University College London, said that women who combine work with children and marriage do seem to have better health than full-time housewives. Even though they may experience high levels of stress sometimes.
It is not a question of chicken-and-egg either. Dr. McMunn said it is the experience of work plus having a family that brings on the better health, not the fact that only healthier mothers decide to carry on working.
The researchers examined data on women born in 1946 from the Medical Research Council's National Study of Health and Development. The data registers their health from 1946 until they are 54. Women's health was examined, with the help of a questionnaire at the ages of 26 through to 54. Every decade, the questionnaire collects data on each woman's work history, whether she is/was married, has children, her height and weight.
The healthiest women were the ones who had all three of the following:
-- A Partner
-- Children
-- A job
Those reporting the worst health were stay-at-home mothers, followed by childless women and single mothers.
38% of stay-at-home mothers were obese when they reached their 50s, for working mothers the percentage was 23%.
Written by: Christian Nordqvist
Editor: Medical News Today

Pages
You are claiming that the Weekly Standard is a neutral publication?
PumpkinAngel
Perhaps they teach those skills in law school?
PumpkinAngel
Jennie
<<
Jennie
<<>>
They are no more or less neutral than FOX, CNN, MSN and wherever else we get our news from, at least in my humble opinion.
>"Really? That's certainly not what I have been reading. But that leads us back to the question I asked before.....Which one of the Kennedy's you listed (Joe, Jack and Teddy) were convicted of murder and/or rape?"
None of them have been convicted but a couple of them should have been.
"Unless you are telling us that you only believe the innocent until proven guilty, what the jury of peers concludes if you happen to also agree with the conclusion handed down? If so, what exactly qualifies you to be judge and jury in these cases?"
Nothing qualifies me to be judge and jury in these cases and I never said that.<
Your responses to pumpkin contradict each other. How do you know that they should of been convicted? Do you have inside data? Or is it just your opinion based on media reports?
Chris
The truth may be out there but lies are in your head. Terry Pratchett
Pages