Work is good for your health?
Find a Conversation
| Mon, 05-15-2006 - 5:25am |
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/healthnews.php?newsid=43421
Working Mothers Healthier Than Full-time Housewives
Main Category: Women's Health / OBGYN News
Article Date: 15 May 2006 - 1:00am (PDT)
According to new research carried out in Britain, working mothers enjoy better health than full-time housewives. Despite the stress working mothers face by holding down a job, dealing with childcare, housework and striving to keep the family happy.
It appears that working mothers, when compared to full-time housewives, are less likely to become overweight, have a better level of health and a healthier relationship. The study also found that single mothers experience worse health than working mothers who have a partner and children.
You can read about this study in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
Team leader, Dr. Anne McMunn, University College London, said that women who combine work with children and marriage do seem to have better health than full-time housewives. Even though they may experience high levels of stress sometimes.
It is not a question of chicken-and-egg either. Dr. McMunn said it is the experience of work plus having a family that brings on the better health, not the fact that only healthier mothers decide to carry on working.
The researchers examined data on women born in 1946 from the Medical Research Council's National Study of Health and Development. The data registers their health from 1946 until they are 54. Women's health was examined, with the help of a questionnaire at the ages of 26 through to 54. Every decade, the questionnaire collects data on each woman's work history, whether she is/was married, has children, her height and weight.
The healthiest women were the ones who had all three of the following:
-- A Partner
-- Children
-- A job
Those reporting the worst health were stay-at-home mothers, followed by childless women and single mothers.
38% of stay-at-home mothers were obese when they reached their 50s, for working mothers the percentage was 23%.
Written by: Christian Nordqvist
Editor: Medical News Today

Pages
....and just the tip of the iceberg.
PumpkinAngel
Specifically how was SH a threat to our soil?
<>
So if someone disagrees with the administration you expect them to move out of the country?
PumpkinAngel
"Who did we (US) fund, support and train?"
Ironically, Osama bin Laden. We were laboring under the delusion that the Soviet Union would be his sole target. We bought into the cliche "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". If ever smebody could prove that cliche wrong, it's been him.
In all fairness, I am pretty sure he never made the statement in the first place. He strongly suggested it, but never actually said it. Even then, he knew that the evidence just wasn't there. Cheney went a bit further, but even he stopped short of a declarative statement. Here is an article from 2003 on this subject:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2003/09/16/cheney_link_of_iraq_911_challenged/
Here is a story about Cheney backtracking on the claim/suggestion:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5233810/
"
Pages