Work is good for your health?

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Work is good for your health?
1599
Mon, 05-15-2006 - 5:25am

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/healthnews.php?newsid=43421
Working Mothers Healthier Than Full-time Housewives

Main Category: Women's Health / OBGYN News
Article Date: 15 May 2006 - 1:00am (PDT)

According to new research carried out in Britain, working mothers enjoy better health than full-time housewives. Despite the stress working mothers face by holding down a job, dealing with childcare, housework and striving to keep the family happy.

It appears that working mothers, when compared to full-time housewives, are less likely to become overweight, have a better level of health and a healthier relationship. The study also found that single mothers experience worse health than working mothers who have a partner and children.

You can read about this study in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

Team leader, Dr. Anne McMunn, University College London, said that women who combine work with children and marriage do seem to have better health than full-time housewives. Even though they may experience high levels of stress sometimes.

It is not a question of chicken-and-egg either. Dr. McMunn said it is the experience of work plus having a family that brings on the better health, not the fact that only healthier mothers decide to carry on working.

The researchers examined data on women born in 1946 from the Medical Research Council's National Study of Health and Development. The data registers their health from 1946 until they are 54. Women's health was examined, with the help of a questionnaire at the ages of 26 through to 54. Every decade, the questionnaire collects data on each woman's work history, whether she is/was married, has children, her height and weight.

The healthiest women were the ones who had all three of the following:

-- A Partner
-- Children
-- A job

Those reporting the worst health were stay-at-home mothers, followed by childless women and single mothers.

38% of stay-at-home mothers were obese when they reached their 50s, for working mothers the percentage was 23%.

Written by: Christian Nordqvist
Editor: Medical News Today

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-26-2006
Tue, 06-06-2006 - 6:58pm

"For starters, healthcare."

I'm not sure what you're talking about, but if you're saying that the USA has healthcare and Canada doesn't, then i'm really confused! I may be wrong, but you always hear about large bills when people go to the Emerg Room, or to go to the Doctor for a visit. (this might not be the case, especially if you have medical care from your company) ...

what I do know is that the Healthcare system in the states is (at least at large) privatized, and ours isn't. We have universal health care, so...no bills when you go to the doctor.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-03-2006
Tue, 06-06-2006 - 7:04pm
I'm glad I'm making some peace here!
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-03-2006
Tue, 06-06-2006 - 7:06pm
Would these links be from credible sources?
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-03-2006
Tue, 06-06-2006 - 7:09pm

How so?

If you wouldn't vacation in his country, you definitely wouldn't want him in your country. How is that lame? I think alot of women's logic here is lame.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-03-2006
Tue, 06-06-2006 - 7:12pm

No, I'm a bit more intelligent than to think that Canada has no healthcare. I'd take the US healthcare system anyday over Canada's.

But, I know I will hear a story about someone's uncle's cousin's friend that received a heart transplant in one day and they lived happily ever after. So, that kind of defeats my case.

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-12-2003
Tue, 06-06-2006 - 7:20pm

Welll... if you think regular old newspaper sources reporting regular news is reliable, yes. Although I could always pull something out of my you know where.

Here's a case of police setting up drugs deals between 2 undercover agents so they could shut down a bar for promoting drug sales.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/67514_oscars23.shtml

Here's an article about how federal agencies request all records from many companies, including America Online, UPS, Fedex, Microsoft MSN, and Yahoo.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/67514_oscars23.shtml

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-12-2003
Tue, 06-06-2006 - 7:23pm
Ok.... so basically, because I wouldn't want him here, he's a threat? I don't see how that works. A threat means there is actual danger that he WOULD come here. I can't exactly call South African Black Mambas (poisonous snake) a threat to this country, because although they would be DANGEROUS if they were in my house, there is no possibility that they will actually BE in my house.
iVillage Member
Registered: 09-08-2003
Tue, 06-06-2006 - 7:26pm
So you personally know everyone at the NSA?
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-03-2006
Tue, 06-06-2006 - 7:38pm

"So you personally know everyone at the NSA?"
Whoa.. that was a leap.

"If I were to decide to run for political office, you can be darned sure that things would appear in the news that would paint me in an unfavorable light. My opinions of religion, this administration, choice rights, anything and everything I have ever discussed could come out. If you don't think this is a danger to you, fine. But you are kidding yourself to think it doesn' t matter."

Well, if you did decide to run for political office I'd want to know your opinions on religion, this administration and choice rights. I'd want to be an informed voter. What are you trying to hide, hypothetically if you were running for office?

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-03-2006
Tue, 06-06-2006 - 7:43pm
Well, what is the reason you wouldn't want him here? Is it because he could possibly kill you for not agreeing with him? Is it because you would have no rights?

Pages