Mom Wants Death Benefits for Twins Conceived After the Dad's Death
Find a Conversation
Mom Wants Death Benefits for Twins Conceived After the Dad's Death
| Mon, 01-10-2011 - 1:49pm |
This one made me read further, in the article it goes on to say that the case is not unique - "At least four families have sued the Social Security Administration to secure benefits for children conceived after their fathers died.”
Here's the link.. what do you think, should the mom receive SS Benefits? After all, it was her choice..

Pages
Yes, totally agree.
i don't know, i'd be curious how these cases play out in court.
Kevali
Second, yes, if she was already pregnant before he died, yes she should get survivor benefits. It doesn't matter if she became pregnant "the natural way," or used any form of assisted reproductive technology (IUI, IVF, etc), it only matters that she was already pregnant before he died. Why is it different? Because the baby was already conceived, and since nobody (usually) plans to die, benefits should be received. The woman in this case *intentionally* became pregnant after he died. Her fault, her choice, her decision, her dime.
daddy not alive is what i meant, let's not confuse deceased dad with dead beat dad!
I have a friend whose husband was killed when she was pregnant, and her son receives survivor's benefits.
The article that was in the original OP said SS benefits could be awarded in some states due to their state laws on wills/probate etc.
i understand this and i'm sorry for your friend...what i was trying to get to the bottom of is HOW they have determined entitlement in the past and will fight for entitlement with this NJ case.
Pages