November Fluff

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-11-2013
November Fluff
202
Mon, 11-11-2013 - 11:33am

Yes, it is November. Enough of the October "Pink". That doesn't mean we forget and still do things for breast cancer, but we need to go on. The "Pink" obviously works as if you saw GMA this morning, Amy was diagnosed with Breast Cancer. This was her first ever mammogram and she did it in October to go along with the "Pink" campaign. 

1. Do you have Thanksgiving plans yet?

2. What is your favorite side dish for Thanksgiving?

3. What is your favorite dessert for Thanksgiving (trying to get ideas as we were invited to a friends home and was asked to bring dessert)?

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-27-1998
Tue, 11-12-2013 - 5:14pm

savcal2011 wrote:
<p><blockquote class="quote-msg quote-nest-1 odd"><div class="quote-author"><em class="placeholder">fallflower</em> wrote:</div>&lt;p style="font-size:13px"&gt;Yes, that is exactly what you asked me, I read the comments.  I'm still trying to figure out why Morty fibbed and said I didn't watch either GMA or TV, can you answer that one?  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="font-size:13px"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;"Morty" was speaking about Bord who does not watch GMA nor TV.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="font-size:13px"&gt;For your "new" question...yes, I check out GMA on a regular basis, not the whole thing of course!  I also read a number of other news sites on a daily basis.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="font-size:13px"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why not the whole thing? Why is that an "of course" answer?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</blockquote></p><p>Why don't you let Morty stand up on her own?</p>

She's "resting" and of course, the usual double standard.

PumpkinAngel

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-01-2002
Tue, 11-12-2013 - 5:14pm

savcal2011 wrote:
  Actually, 99% of the time that I research something, it is because I want to know more. Period.</p>

You must be exhausted.

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-11-2013
Tue, 11-12-2013 - 5:11pm

Actually, 99% of the time that I research something, it is because I want to know more. Period.

And the other 1% is because you don't believe me Laughing

Avatar for savcal2011
iVillage Member
Registered: 10-06-2010
Tue, 11-12-2013 - 5:10pm

fallflower wrote:
<p style="font-size:13px">Here is the article I read as followup. <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2013/11/11/abc-news-amy-robach-reveals-breast-cancer-diagnosis/" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2013/11/11/abc-news-amy-robach-reveals-breast-cancer-diagnosis/</a></p><p style="font-size:13px">There are a lot of details in here that you didn't include (not by design I don't think - but simply because you were giving a short reference and the hight points, which I think you did accurately).</p><p style="font-size:13px"> </p><p style="font-size:13px">Of course, I don't know how many times I can say that I THINK YOU PORTRAYED WHAT YOU SAW ACCURATELY before you realize that those words don't mean I THINK YOU WERE LYING.</p><p style="font-size:13px"><strong> Exactly what was on the show. I think I did include some links too. And yes, I will still believe you think I was lying and doubted what I said. That is usually why people go and research things farther. </strong></p>

Actually, 99% of the time that I research something, it is because I want to know more. Period.

"I don’t mind a banshee, that’s fine. 2 banshees? I HATE you. I actually wish bad things upon you." -- Day[9] Daily #459 P1

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-01-2002
Tue, 11-12-2013 - 5:10pm

savcal2011 wrote:
  You said the woman's husband was a doctor.  I PRESUMED (as I said in the first post) that she and her husband had talked about breast cancer.  I don't know what you think I'm trying to cover up here.</p>

You didn't presume anything.  You spoke of these things and mistakendly and knowingly took them as read.  And from that point of ignorance shockingly proceeded to insult and bash Fallflower.

Is this going to last a few more hours or will you simply admit you made a mistake and from that, should never have insulted Fallflower?  Which is the routine repeated over and over by you and others here.  So it would be nice to put a mirror on your m.o., so you and others can see yourselves and your behavior.  And we might actually return to a genuine Debate Board.

Or not.  You can as always, choose to keep up the posturing and pretend no one thinks the less of the poster. 

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-27-1998
Tue, 11-12-2013 - 5:09pm

fallflower wrote:
<p><span style="font-size:13px">I don't think PKA answers to anyone but herself, her boss and possibly her God.</span></p><p><strong><span style="font-size:13px">I guess she wears the pants in her family? <img src="/forums/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-wink.gif" alt="Wink" title="Wink" border="0" /></span></strong></p>

Why would you say something like that?

PumpkinAngel

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-27-1998
Tue, 11-12-2013 - 5:08pm

fallflower wrote:
<p><span style="font-size:13px"><strong>Coming from a poster using two different names in the same thread</strong> and not reading a number of posts, evidence doesn't seem to support following the thread perfectly.  :)</span></p><p><strong><span style="font-size:13px">And you have never seen this before? Bawahhhaa....Ginkgo Biloba?</span></strong></p>

Well no, but then again that's not what I said, now was it?  Irony, not reading the post again.

 

PumpkinAngel

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-11-2013
Tue, 11-12-2013 - 5:08pm

Yep I DID include links. You could have just said, oh I read your links as I missed the show:

http://www.wistv.com/story/23933618/abcs-amy-robach-to-have-double-mastectomy

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/11/amy-robach-breast-cancer_n_4254093.html

Thanks for doubting what I heard with my own ears and saw with my own eyes this morning, BAER.

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-11-2013
Tue, 11-12-2013 - 5:05pm

Here is the article I read as followup. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2013/11/11/abc-news-amy-robach-reveals-breast-cancer-diagnosis/

There are a lot of details in here that you didn't include (not by design I don't think - but simply because you were giving a short reference and the hight points, which I think you did accurately).

 

Of course, I don't know how many times I can say that I THINK YOU PORTRAYED WHAT YOU SAW ACCURATELY before you realize that those words don't mean I THINK YOU WERE LYING.

 Exactly what was on the show. I think I did include some links too. And yes, I will still believe you think I was lying and doubted what I said. That is usually why people go and research things farther. 

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-01-2002
Tue, 11-12-2013 - 5:03pm

Well, not this dh.  Just the first one I think.

Pages