Still think the death penalty is cruel?

iVillage Member
Registered: 12-06-2004
Still think the death penalty is cruel?
811
Tue, 03-06-2007 - 9:52am

This crime was committed with the children home.

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-26-2006
Tue, 03-13-2007 - 6:32pm
What would be the motives of the police, and the prosecution to lie about this mother?
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-26-2006
Tue, 03-13-2007 - 6:33pm
That is my question to you. You keep saying the technicality was the cop lying. How do you know it was? Not to mention if that cop lied he would have been charged with perjury. This would have been widely publicised. The only person accusing the officer is the defense team.
iVillage Member
Registered: 11-20-2006
Tue, 03-13-2007 - 6:35pm

>>Then why did she post a statement I made about corrupt police dept?<<

Because unlike other people, when she quotes a post, she quotes the ENTIRE post. The relevant statement was the one AFTER the corrupt police dept. statement, you know, the one talking about criminals confessing.

>>If the cop lied why wasnt he charged? Perjury is a serious offense.<<

I don't know, why weren't these cops charged? Probably because cops rarely get charged unless they do something REALLY wrong, and the public knows about it.

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=9d1e4edc-e063-4065-9aad-7f7c1c84e86e

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/19/AR2007021900994.html

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-20-2006
Tue, 03-13-2007 - 6:37pm

No, they don't have any motivation to convict the wrong person. But they do have the motivation to help along a conviction that they "believe in their hearts" is right, if the evidence doesn't look like it will be enough.

And you are again saying "corrupt PD" when I specifically said that the PD does not have to be anywhere near corrupt for one officer to lie.

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-20-2006
Tue, 03-13-2007 - 6:38pm
If it has never been stated, then you really have no idea of knowing if that was the technicality or not.
iVillage Member
Registered: 11-20-2006
Tue, 03-13-2007 - 6:39pm
Ummm... to win a case that they might otherwise not win? If they really believe, despite not enough evidence, that she did it? I'm not inclined to take gut feelings as truth.
iVillage Member
Registered: 11-20-2006
Tue, 03-13-2007 - 6:40pm
Because I thought you said that it was the technicality. Apparently I was wrong.
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-26-2006
Tue, 03-13-2007 - 8:12pm

<<>>

Ok thank you for clarifying that.

<<>>

BWAHAHAHAHA. I guess you have no idea how Internal investigations work do you?

Are you trying to link throwing food on the floor to perjury?

Your second post wouldnt warrant being charged. He didnt do anything wrong.

Clark was shot along with Robert White after they got into a dispute on Jan. 24 with Cpl. Keith Washington, a 16-year veteran of the department, while making a delivery at Washington's Accokeek home.

"At some point in time during the delivery, a verbal altercation ensued between one of the deliverymen and the officer," said Prince George's County police Lt. April Delabrer. "That turned physical when the man assaulted the officer. At that point, the second man also started assaulting the officer. At that time, the officer decided -- fearing for his life -- he discharged his service revolver."

http://www.nbc4.com/news/10910758/detail.html

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-26-2006
Tue, 03-13-2007 - 8:15pm

<<>>

I can honestly say that after speaking to my DH that isnt the case. Police dont work like that. Officers dont perjure themselves to convict someone. Could it happen? Sure anything can happen. Again if it happened why wasnt he charged?

<<>>

Do you think the defense team lies? Maybe just twists the truth a little?

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-26-2006
Tue, 03-13-2007 - 8:17pm
That is what I have said to you numerous times now. Since it hasnt been stated why do you keep saying the technicality was that the police officer lied?

Pages