He did state that he provided enough for them to live a privileged life..
It's sad he wasn't around, but he did provide for them (or so he says). But no amount of cash is going to change whether or not he was involved in their lives.
Fair or not fair? I'm not sure.
Ask me anything :)
The children were raised on 1.5 million apiece.
(from 1988 to 2002. Their mother testified she received a total of about $3 million for them during that period....Lawyer Hillel Chodos, who represents the children, said in opening statements that they had lived a life similar to many upper middle-class children)
Looks like jury sided
Thanks for the link.
Honestly, I feel badly for those kids because he wasn't and doesn't ever want to be their father, but he did uphold his end of the bargain WRT child support. If you're considering just money, then I'd say it's fair.