This is a few years old, but we don't talk about this near enough.
I thought I'd bump this up.
As much as I've read on this, no one has really addressed it but Blaylock. Does that mean it's insignificant? Not relevant? Not understood?
I think the latter of the three may play significance. And to my understanding, if it's not addressed = why? My children deserve better than 1/2 baked answers.
Those that claim the BBB is fully matured and operational at birth are relying on the lack of data as proof.
*Correspondence to Celia F. Brosnan, Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461
ArticleRole of central nervous system microvascular pericytes in activation of antigen-primed splenic T-lymphocytes
Roumen Balabanov, Thomas Beaumont, Paula Dore-Duffy *
Department of Neurology, Division of Neuroimmunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
email: Paula Dore-Duffy (firstname.lastname@example.org)
*Correspondence to Paula Dore-Duffy, Department of Neurology, Division of Neuroimmunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 421 E. Canfield Avenue, 3124 Elliman Building, Detroit, MI 48201.
It seems to me that something very recent has come out stating the brain is in development longer than scientists/researchers realized.
I'm not a specialist in neuroscience, nor is any pediatrician.