Pharmafia (Pharma Shills)

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-06-2009
Pharmafia (Pharma Shills)
46
Mon, 12-28-2009 - 11:10am

As cunchymomto2 (and others) have accused myself (and others) of being paid pharmacy advocates - I thought Dr David Gorski's reprint of this tired ad hominem would be instructive.

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-17-2005
Wed, 12-30-2009 - 10:53pm

Need I remind you that you have accused us of being every kind of conspiracy theorists ever heard of...

Shakes head, rolls eyes...

*Tired* is right.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-09-2008
Mon, 01-04-2010 - 3:04pm

It's ironic to me Jon that you post the same "ad hominem" defending yourself as what you accuse others of doing. (the ironies of ironies).

Rands

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-18-2007
Fri, 01-08-2010 - 1:49pm
This post is just stupid. I can't tell if Gorski really believes that our nation's economy right now isn't dependent upon health care and the sale of prescription drugs, or if he just believes that finding vaccines to be cancer causing might put a dent in the amount of surgeries he performs.

That's right, we're paranoid.

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-17-2005
Fri, 01-08-2010 - 8:55pm

Speaking of pharma shills, I've been tied up with one on Facebook.

I'm a fan of Vaccination Information Network (VINE).

I am told that no, they are not being paid to debate vaccines, it's the vitamin/alternative medicine pushers they're after, lol.

If these people are so convinced that "alternative medicines" don't work then why not spend that money on - oh, I don't know, maybe an autism study...

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-17-2005
Fri, 01-08-2010 - 8:57pm

And you got it spelled all wrong Jon, it's P H A R M A M A F I A.

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-06-2009
Mon, 01-11-2010 - 11:47am

Sorry for the misspelling - pharmamafia has a better ring to it.


As for the ad hominem - I do think Gorski can be harsh.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-09-2008
Mon, 01-11-2010 - 12:36pm

Once again Jon, not sure how my name keeps coming up in your posts - but alas I digress.


So, when you're ready to post one of my posts regarding conspiracy theory on the below, then we'll talk about it further; until then, your below is just libel.


Dana and shmed have proposed a variety of conspiracy laden ideas as to the "suppressed" information surrounding vaccines, the nature of pharmacy self promotion over "other, better more natural approaches" and have generally proven themselves immune (ha ha) to logic, facts and the overwhelming view of modern medical science.

Rands


Rands

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-06-2009
Mon, 01-11-2010 - 2:58pm

*sigh*


Libel, I don't think you know what it means.


Let's start with this post


http://messageboards.ivillage.com/iv-ppvaccinedb/?msg=4984.1


By posting you infer that there is a sinister connection between Merck and the CDC.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-09-2008
Mon, 01-11-2010 - 3:09pm

I'm well aware of what libel means. Trust me.


It's YTBD what the links you provided have to do with anything that you accused me of in writing.

Rands

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-06-2009
Mon, 01-11-2010 - 4:50pm

You have more than 1200 posts to this site.

Pages