iVillage Member
Registered: 11-07-2007
Tue, 07-08-2008 - 1:09pm

Tetanus and Polio by Viera Scheibner

http://www.whale. to/vaccines/ scheibner3. html

ABOUT THESE DISEASES by Viera Scheibner (Jan 1998)

Mrs J Woods letter in the Summer 1997 edition of The Informed Parent
inspired me to write this letter to the Editor of TIP. J Wood stopped
any further vaccinations when she realised that her fully vaccinated
child developed a most frightening episode of whooping cough and
suffered chronic ill health for years because of all those vaccines
injected into his system.

Interestingly, the specialist confirmed to her that the child's
immune system was not very strong, but the GP called her
irresponsible when she decided not to continue with any further
vaccine injections (I would not worry very much about a GP's advise
since GP's in the UK labour under a major monetary conflict of
interest in vaccinating) . She stood her ground, however, but is still
worried about diseases like tetanus and polio.

1. Tetanus is a very rare disease in developed countries: there are
only about 12 cases of tetanus per year in Australia, and half of
those who got it were vaccinated. Perhaps the most interesting thing
about tetanus is that those who get it do not develop immunity to it.
How does one get tetanus? Well, from deep puncture wounds. In other
words the pathogen (Clostridium tetani) is literally injected into
the body via the deep puncture wounds. Vaccine injection does the
same thing: it bypasses the normal portals of entry (the mouth and
nose) and delivers the pathogen and toxins straight into the blood
stream which triggers an unnatural, abnormal, deranged immune
response called sensitisation.

Far from immunising, tetanus (and other) vaccine injections make the
recipients more susceptible to diseases. J. Wood clearly saw it in
her child: chronic ill health, recurrent coughs and colds for years.
It is very likely, that the obvious improvements of her child's
health was achieved by him finally developing whooping cough in its
acute form. --any parents report either a marked improvement or
disappearance of 'asthma' after their vaccinated children developed
acute whooping cough. Medical research demonstrated that having
whooping cough prevents asthma.
One must wonder how much of that
'asthma' is just a chronic whooping cough as a result of the
vaccinated child's immune system being deranged by vaccination and
not being able to mount a proper, acute, immune response.

If this does not make sense, then perhaps something else will: the
New England Journal of Medicine published in 1984 that tetanus
booster injections result in the same derangement of T4 and T8 cells
as seen in AIDS patients. A 'mysterious' new syndrome emerged in the
US: thousands of children are developing AIDS symptoms (with deranged
T4 and T8 cells) without being HIV positive My well-considered
opinion is that it comes from that T (standing for tetanus) in the DPT vaccine.

2. Polio has been painted as some natural scourge of humanity. Yet,
epidemics and outbreaks of polio in Europe go back to only less than
100 years. The 1949-50 and later outbreaks of polio were demonstrably
caused by intensified diphtheria and whooping cough vaccination,
tonsillectomies, other injections (painkillers) and a variety of
traumas. They invented a name for it: provocation poliomyelitis. Even
though this has not been discussed in literature, the earliest
outbreaks were no doubt triggered by intensified smallpox
vaccination. The evidence for this connection comes from Egyptian
excavations: some mummies had withered limbs; but of course,
variolation (a crude form of smallpox inoculation) has been practised
thousands of years ago, and most particularly, in Egypt.

When the first, injectable, polio vaccine was tested on 1.8 million
American children, within a few days they had a huge epidemic of
paralytic polio: in the vaccinated, their parents and other contacts.
They called it the Cutter incident and claimed that some of the
vaccines (produced by the Cutter Laboratories) contained live polio
. So, the company withdrew their vaccines despite polio vaccines
produced by other manufacturers also causing paralysis in this outbreak.

The OP vaccines are officially causing paralysis, allegedly only
10-12 reported cases per year in the USA. The word 'reported' is the
key word here. With the mass use of the polio vaccines and continuing
occurence of polio in the vaccinated, the necessity arose to redefine
the disease polio. The classical definition of polio is a disease
with residual paralysis which resolves within 2 months (usually
within days). The new definition of polio now is 'a disease with
residual paralysis persisting for more than 60 days.' This is the
secret formula of 'eradication' of polio. Children are still getting
polio, but those cases which resolve within 60 days (which represent
some 90% of cases) are not diagnosed as polio. A new disease emerged:
viral meningitis and as the incidence of polio plummeted, so did the
incidence of viral meningitis sky rocketed.

The best (and perhaps most frightening) example of these "elegant
administrative moves" is how they allegedly eliminated polio in the
Americas (meaning South America). The Journal of Infectious Diseases
published in 1991 the results of a major vaccination drive between
1985 and 1989 to eliminate polio. Within 4 months they had a huge
outbreak of paralytic polio (350 cases). They decided to reformulate
the vaccine. Now if this outbreak had occurred in the unvaccinated
they would not have had to reformulate the vaccine. The outbreak
occured in the vaccinated.

However, the outbreaks with ever increasing number of reported cases
of 'flaccid paralysis' in the vaccinated continued. So what did they
do? They started discarding most of the reported cases of flaccid
paralysis. Out of 2094 reported cases they only 'confirmed' 130, the
rest (1964) were discarded.
They published a graph which shows ever
increasing number of reported cases as shadowy columns in the
background and the ever decreasing numbers of confirmed cases as
black columns in the forefront. I praise them for publishing it this
way: any discerning and unbrainwashed reader can see very clearly
what happened in the Americas between 1985 - 1989: mass vaccination
caused sustained outbreaks of paralytic polio and they tried to
camouflage it by discarding the vast majority of cases. When they
finally stopped the program in 1989, even the number of reported
cases (shown as those shadowy columns in the background) went down.

The same happened in other countries: huge epidemics of paralysis
followed mass-vaccination drives.

How many vaccines does the child need to be protected? Children are
given ever increasing numbers of 'boosters'. Why? This trend makes
sense only when you consider that all those outbreaks and epidemics
of any 'vaccine preventable' diseases occur in the vaccinated.
vaccines are ineffective.

A shortage of space does not allow me to elaborate more on this
interesting subject'

There is only one immunity: the natural immunity which is achieved by
children going through infectious diseases of childhood. They are
here to prime and mature the immune system of children and they
represent developmental milestones. Perhaps more on this subject in
some of the next issues of TIP. Some problems with infectious
diseases are results of mismanagement: if a child with severe measles
is given antibiotics instead of vitamin A and C and its fever is
suppressed you are asking for trouble.

And last but not least: no matter how worried anybody is about
diseases, one should remember one important thing, namely that
vaccines do not prevent diseases, they make you sick.

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-18-2007
In reply to: teh_maverick
Wed, 07-09-2008 - 9:51am


I don't think this is well researched.