Vaccines fueling autism epidemic

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-28-2003
Vaccines fueling autism epidemic
3
Wed, 06-11-2003 - 4:43pm
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\WorldNetDaily Vaccines fueling autism epidemic.html

Geier insists, "I'm pro-vaccines, but the bottom line is that our kids are getting massive amounts of mercury. Mercury has been withdrawn from everything, including animal vaccines, yet we keep injecting it into our children. Everyone should absolutely refuse to take a vaccine shot that has thimerosal in it, and they should insist on reading the vaccine package insert. Our data showed that the more mercury children received in their childhood vaccines the more neurodevelopment disorders there are. We've looked at this every possible way and every time there's massive evidence to support it."

Further in the article:

"Even so, based on the Aventis admission that the package insert does not reflect what is in the vaccine, it will be difficult to know when, if ever, the thimerosal actually has been removed. This skews the data about the relationship between thimerosal and autism. More important, it means parents cannot be sure the vaccinations their children receive are free of mercury."


Dawn

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-27-2003
Wed, 06-11-2003 - 6:01pm
Dawn- the link goes to your computer, not the web. Do you have the link out so I can read the artvcile in its entirety?

TIA~ Miki

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-28-2003
Thu, 06-12-2003 - 5:22am
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-17-2003
Fri, 06-13-2003 - 9:46am
Thank you for posting this. I will be taking a copy of it with me to the Ped for my DD's next well-check up.

I will also be showing him where the lot numbers/manufacturers that he gave me from my DS's shot record shows that Thimerosal WAS in his shots. He told me that my DS has not received any shots with mercury. (Guess he needs to pay attention).

The Ped has threatened to drop us for non-vax. That he can do because it is his right. Originally he had said he would work with us on a delayed/selective schedule.

What he can not do is refuse us in an emergency because he has seen them both since birth. (checked this with my lawyer friend). :o)

So, we will most likely get a "family Dr" MD for us and our children if he refuses to see them for well checks. At least they don't push the issue. Ped's are pretty much there just to give shots anyway. Every time my DS needed something like his anal abscess's looked at or worked on we were sent to a specialist. When he broke his leg we were sent to a specialist for X-rays and a cast. But not before being told to come in so they could look at him of course.... Why pay a Ped to do what we can do with an MD?