What about those w/documented injuries?

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-28-2007
What about those w/documented injuries?
5
Fri, 11-13-2009 - 5:03pm

How do we reconcile ourselves with the Bailey Banks and Hannah Polings out there? If vaccines have nothing to do with causing autism (either some or all) how is it the vaccine court awards said children? Is it simply because the courts have an alternative to look to, (encephalitus, mitochondrial disorder etc)?

Thus, are the above effectively the missing link?!! Vaccines don't cause autism per se but they have been proven to cause brain injury that later becomes an autism related diagnoses.

Dee

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-17-2005
Mon, 12-07-2009 - 2:13pm
If anyone wants to read more from Dr. Poling, just do a search on this site (advanced search) and you will find letters that he wrote which did get published. Those posts have some links and other information that you will learn a lot from reading. I tried to find a link to make it easier, but I can't find it and I don't have the time to search myself or I would. I do remember it being a really useful thread.
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-17-2005
Mon, 12-07-2009 - 2:08pm

If you look at it historically, you will find that there are a lot more children who have been awarded a case over some sort of damages caused by vaccines. Look at cases prior to Hannah and Bailey.

Back in the 70's the doctors admitted to the fact that the vaccine damaged the child's brain. There are plenty of families who were awarded cases, but they are not allowed to discuss it I'm sure. If we look at court cases prior to the invention of the new *vaccine court*, I'm sure you will come to some logical conclusions...

But then what? What can or will be done? Nothing! We have a study done by the WHO stating that the H1N1 was a natural disease, not man-made. Now, we have another study, done by those with less conflicts of interest, stating that the H1N1 was a man-made disease. Who's right? (I'm guessing its the study done by those with less COI's.)

We learn that *science* in all of it's corrupted glory, has been lying to us (for years now) about global warming. Those who fell for it will forever be trying to dismiss the reality, just like they do with vaccines.

The refusal to do the vaccinated VS never-vaccinated study is no different than Pfizer saying for years that they would do a study to find out if their hormone product was causing breast cancer. How many deaths occurred during those years of lies? How many families had to go through the trauma of breast cancer before the COURT SYSTEM finally gave us the truth. (Because we would NEVER get it from *science*.) For Autism there is no such court system unfortunately.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-09-2008
Mon, 12-07-2009 - 11:58am

What I found interesting about the Poling case was it appeared that immediately damage control was trying to be done calling it an isolated incident due to underlying conditions. Dr. Poling tried on many occassions correcting this wide spread statement of it being underlying.

Rands

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-17-2005
Sat, 11-14-2009 - 10:33pm

Ain't it funny how those are almost always ignored?

But then there are those who watched it happen within days of vaccine...those "coincidences" the many many many "coincidences".

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-18-2007
Fri, 11-13-2009 - 9:56pm

Thank you for reminding us of this very simple fact. Feels like an impenetrable maze at times, no doubt... but not infallible.

Jamie