WHY Won't They Do The Research?

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-17-2007
WHY Won't They Do The Research?
56
Tue, 11-24-2009 - 8:17am

http://autisminnb.blogspot.com/2009/02/vaccine-autism-war-why-wont-they-do.html

Apart from the many thousands of allegedly hysterical, delusional parents and allegedly fraudulent, huckster professionals who have raised safety concerns, particularly autism concerns, about vaccines two high ranking members of the American public health system have stated a need for more research of possible vaccine-autism connections.

Dr. Julie Gerberding, former head of the CDC and Dr. Bernadine Healy, former head of the NIH and the American Red Cross have BOTH indicated that more research of vaccine-autism issues COULD and SHOULD be done.

So WHY are public health authorities like the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee REFUSING to authorize funding to research possible vaccine-autism connections?

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-16-2009
Wed, 11-25-2009 - 4:24pm
If the study is done I wonder if (if the conclusion is that vaccines are not as safe as we are led to believe or there is a connection to autism or whatever other conclusion that would be considered negative to the pharmaceutical industry) it could even get published. According to this: http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/165/6/786

Photobucket

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-22-2005
Wed, 11-25-2009 - 6:13pm
I wonder if there could be a way to bypass that, such as going through a psychology journal instead of a medical journal?










Photobucket




iVillage Member
Registered: 06-16-2009
Wed, 11-25-2009 - 6:25pm

Do you think psychology journals have different sponsors? That

Photobucket

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-17-2005
Thu, 11-26-2009 - 10:21pm

Why would they create a pandemic and then pretend to study the adverse events caused by the product they created the pandemic for?

Did that make sense? I'm sleepy so I can't tell, lol. But this a really good read:

http://dprogram.net/2009/08/24/the-engineering-of-pandemics-vaccine-induced-disease-epidemic-outbreaks/

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-09-2008
Mon, 12-07-2009 - 9:14am

Oh, goodness no.

Rands

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-09-2008
Mon, 12-07-2009 - 9:22am
This raises a valid point, in addition to, raw data is not revealed, only the conclusions. The question that would always come into my mind is

Rands

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-16-2009
Mon, 12-07-2009 - 6:18pm

Many times when I have read that people want research done with re: to vaccines

Photobucket

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-17-2005
Mon, 12-07-2009 - 10:27pm

They do try to do the research. "They" meaning those who are trying to prove how dangerous they are. And then "they" get blacklisted or sued. When a doctor considers what his life will be like when he is discredited by his peers - he gives up.

Or in the case of Dr Andrew Moulden - he sits idle, wasting time, until the lawsuit can be scheduled.

I don't have the details yet, but he's being sued. He was just a little ways away from publishing proof that vaccines cause Autism and other brain disorders. He says that stroke occurs in some but not in everyone. It's the stroke that causes the brain damage. He talks about the noticeable slant in the eyes. When I looked at pictures of my son right after vaccines - he had that slant, it is gone now (he's not Autistic). All of the pictures of my brother has that eye slant that he spoke of - except of course those taken before he got his first (and only) vaccine.

I think back to when Jamie first posted about Dr. Moulden. At that time, he was supposed to give a speech in Canada. We never heard a lot about how that turned out, from what I remember. If anyone is interested, look for him on FaceBook.

Dana
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-09-2008
Tue, 12-08-2009 - 7:25am

I understand what you're saying, and perhaps we were just talking about two different things.

Rands

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-17-2009
Tue, 12-08-2009 - 2:13pm

Everyone posting here is 100% wrong.


The