Don't you think I can assume BFN?
Find a Conversation
| Mon, 04-16-2007 - 8:00am |
I'm on cd 31, the last seven months or so I have had cycles on the shorter side, 25-27 days with a random 28 day one thrown in.
I am not charting nor ttc, Best I can pin point dh and I had sex on about cd11-12 and used the withdrawl/then put on condom method. then not again til the other day.
I started thinking something was up when on Thurs.(cd27) I started having abundant ewcm, to the point of feeling like I needed a panty liner for it. this went on for 3 days. Since saturday I have had af cramps like it is coming any minute, but everything has seemed more intense than usual, have had lots of heartburn, some nausea, sore bbs, bad backache, I bought six dollar store tests from two different dollar stores to make sure they were from different batches and they are all negative. The only thing that is bugging me is that an evap line has appeared on ALL of them before the 10 minute period is up, but I am chalking it up to cheapy tests.
But my point is, don't you think if I were pg, in light of the fact that the only time I could have possibly gotten pg, that those tests would be showing at least a little darker by now if I were and I can assume at this point that I am not since they read such low levels of hcg and that this is just a fluke period that is going a little longer than normal?
These cramps are annoying and I want to take my normal mega dose of ibuprofen or naproxen.
| Mon, 04-16-2007 - 8:27am |
| Mon, 04-16-2007 - 8:31am |
| Mon, 04-16-2007 - 8:38am |
