girl names
Find a Conversation
girl names
| Sat, 03-22-2008 - 11:46am |
Out of these names, which seems the least dated/more classic! For some reason, I like names that were more popular awhile ago, but am worried that the baby will always sound 20 years older than she is/someone's mom (if that makes sense!) Or do you think I should just stay away from these? Thanks.
Jessica
Amanda
Christina
Diana
Laura

Pages
Baby Gender Predictor
Cynthia
Mommy to 5
That's funny that you say Jessica.
I think Laura is a nice, classic name. I don't think it's outdated at all.
I don't think Jessica sounds outdated either, but it is my sister's name, and I have two friends named Jessica so maybe that's part of it. They all go mostly by Jess now, but my sister used to be Jessie when we were young.
I also like Diana. It was a friend's younger cousin's name. I always thought it was pretty, and kind of unexpected in a way. She was very spunky. I liked the name on her. This fits in my classic category.
Christina sounds the most towards the outdated direction to
Jessica is the most "dated" - to the 80s
Amanda is very "dated" to the 80s, but it was a classic, if you look back to the 20s, it was used a lot then, then came back for it's 80s rush
Christina is classic, not dated to any era
Diana - kind of dated to the 50s/60s
Laura -
I just replied to your Julie thread where I said that I think 60s-70s names are ready for a comeback.
Thank you, Elena (el
Pages