Question

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-21-2008
Question
2
Mon, 12-01-2008 - 8:46pm

Went to the hospital about 4 days ago cuz no AF had urine PT it was BFN, did a blood test it was BFN now still No AF and having to go for a histopinogram((or howeve u spell it, dye test)) tommorow I am just curious....It is not possible the day they took the blood PT that it was to early to get a BFP? I am assume blood tests r failry accurate yes?


I just don't want to go through the dye test then find out I am pregnant cuz I don't think the dye is a good thing if I was pregnant


Any thoughts?

Ovulation ticker
iVillage Member
Registered: 01-29-2008
In reply to: calendergal
Mon, 12-01-2008 - 8:53pm
I'd tel them before you get the test done and let them know you still haven't had your period and see if theyu'll do another blood test.




Sigs made by hubbswifey, mom2jess_n_ky, and csmith17663

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-19-2008
In reply to: calendergal
Mon, 12-01-2008 - 9:47pm

I just had an HSG this month and I know my hospital would not do an HSg of you were not on days 7-10 of your cycle not only b/c of the pregnancy issue but also because your tubes have the least risk of spasming during this time and a spasm would make your tube look blocked even if it wasn't. Your ticker says day 6 but if you haven't gotten Af, that cannot be right?!


I have read a study on pregnancies that were there during an HSG and there was a 66% mortality rate, so I would definitely be sure. A blood pregnancy test will show 100% of you are pregnant or not if you have implanted alreay. It is the same theory behind a urine test- if the embryo has not implanted then you cannot have any hsg to detect in blood or urine.


Hope this helps

Photobucket

 

Stick, little sprout, stick- in the right place!

Betas: 12dpo: 71; 14 dpo: 220! 18 dpo: 1446!!