How do we reconcile ourselves with the Bailey Banks and Hannah Polings out there? If vaccines have nothing to do with causing autism (either some or all) how is it the vaccine court awards said children? Is it simply because the courts have an alternative to look to, (encephalitus, mitochondrial disorder etc)?
Thus, are the above effectively the missing link?!! Vaccines don't cause autism per se but they have been proven to cause brain injury that later becomes an autism related diagnoses.